{"id":119,"date":"2012-07-05T11:24:05","date_gmt":"2012-07-05T11:24:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.securelegalservices.kaweb-apoc.co.uk\/news\/?p=119"},"modified":"2012-09-20T21:21:16","modified_gmt":"2012-09-20T21:21:16","slug":"simcoe-appeal-rejected","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/costs\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\/","title":{"rendered":"UKSC reject Simcoe appeal"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>Simcoe appeal to the Supreme Court rejected<\/h2>\n<div>\n<p>The Supreme Court has refused permission to appeal in the case of Simcoe v Jacuzzi UK Group plc.<\/p>\n<p>Stating:<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cPermission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by the Supreme Court at this time, bearing in mind that the case has already been the subject of judicial decision and reviewed on appeal; this is a point of practice and procedure more suitable for consideration at Court of Appeal level\u201d. <\/em><\/p>\n<p>This decision effectively means that the decision that interest is recoverable from the date of the authority for assessment in all CFA-funded cases is unlikely to change without any legislative intervention.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>See: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov.uk\/docs\/PTA-1206.pdf\">http:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov.uk\/docs\/PTA-1206.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Simcoe appeal to the Supreme Court rejected The Supreme Court has refused permission to appeal in the case of Simcoe v Jacuzzi UK Group plc. Stating: \u201cPermission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/costs\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[91,21,108,18,90,86,89],"class_list":["post-119","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-costs","tag-appeal","tag-cfa","tag-costs","tag-interest","tag-simcoe","tag-simcoe-v-jacuzzi-uk-group","tag-supreme-court"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>UKSC reject Simcoe appeal -\u00a0Secure Legal Services<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/costs\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"kaweb\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\\\/news\\\/costs\\\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\\\/news\\\/costs\\\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"kaweb\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\\\/news\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/9783cb8e1608eef3786eb26d21af630c\"},\"headline\":\"UKSC reject Simcoe appeal\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-07-05T11:24:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-09-20T21:21:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\\\/news\\\/costs\\\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":139,\"keywords\":[\"Appeal\",\"CFA\",\"Costs\",\"interest\",\"Simcoe\",\"Simcoe v Jacuzzi (UK) Group\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Costs\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\\\/news\\\/costs\\\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\\\/news\\\/costs\\\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\\\/\",\"name\":\"UKSC reject Simcoe appeal -\u00a0Secure Legal Services\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\\\/news\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-07-05T11:24:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-09-20T21:21:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\\\/news\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/9783cb8e1608eef3786eb26d21af630c\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\\\/news\\\/costs\\\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\\\/news\\\/costs\\\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\\\/news\\\/costs\\\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\\\/news\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"UKSC reject Simcoe appeal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\\\/news\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\\\/news\\\/\",\"name\":\"Secure Legal Services\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\\\/news\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\\\/news\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/9783cb8e1608eef3786eb26d21af630c\",\"name\":\"kaweb\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f73171a10bb93ce92fb8ec331d8cf0b85c0005271fe863cbfde677500dd66a39?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f73171a10bb93ce92fb8ec331d8cf0b85c0005271fe863cbfde677500dd66a39?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f73171a10bb93ce92fb8ec331d8cf0b85c0005271fe863cbfde677500dd66a39?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"kaweb\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\\\/news\\\/author\\\/kaweb\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"UKSC reject Simcoe appeal -\u00a0Secure Legal Services","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/costs\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\/","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"kaweb","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/costs\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/costs\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\/"},"author":{"name":"kaweb","@id":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/9783cb8e1608eef3786eb26d21af630c"},"headline":"UKSC reject Simcoe appeal","datePublished":"2012-07-05T11:24:05+00:00","dateModified":"2012-09-20T21:21:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/costs\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\/"},"wordCount":139,"keywords":["Appeal","CFA","Costs","interest","Simcoe","Simcoe v Jacuzzi (UK) Group","Supreme Court"],"articleSection":["Costs"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/costs\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\/","url":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/costs\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\/","name":"UKSC reject Simcoe appeal -\u00a0Secure Legal Services","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-07-05T11:24:05+00:00","dateModified":"2012-09-20T21:21:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/9783cb8e1608eef3786eb26d21af630c"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/costs\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/costs\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/costs\/simcoe-appeal-rejected\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UKSC reject Simcoe appeal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/","name":"Secure Legal Services","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/9783cb8e1608eef3786eb26d21af630c","name":"kaweb","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f73171a10bb93ce92fb8ec331d8cf0b85c0005271fe863cbfde677500dd66a39?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f73171a10bb93ce92fb8ec331d8cf0b85c0005271fe863cbfde677500dd66a39?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f73171a10bb93ce92fb8ec331d8cf0b85c0005271fe863cbfde677500dd66a39?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"kaweb"},"url":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/author\/kaweb\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=119"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":326,"href":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119\/revisions\/326"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=119"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=119"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.securelegalservices.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=119"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}